One of the most tired, commercialised and ridiculed predicaments of pseud's corner is connoted from this well-worn phrase:
Glass half empty/glass half-full.
This is often used to denote placidly for the idea of overachievement,
and not vice versa, because simply, humans want to feel good about
themselves. This is all well and good, until you get a plethora of
anecdotes joining its mundane projection potential.
Putting myself in their shoes
I'm very empathetic
You get out what you put in
He who dares, wins, (Rodders!)
Of course, what are we really trying to say here? The meaning becomes diluted, the thing that fits with 'putting more in' to make the glass 'half full'. But sadly, this is an illusion that comes a cropper.
This is ultimately for didactic and syntactic reasons, abtruding to tactfulness in mind game form, to trick the brain that it won't crash when our mood shifts to the idea that, plainly, was the glass really ever even half full? If the glass wasn't half empty, or half full, in simple terms, to begin with, can we really say it will stay that way?
We are not talking about change, vacillaton, oscillation, movement. We are not saying someone will drink from the glass, or even fill it up.
What we need to do is come to terms with the idea of mirror neurons, the concept of mirror neurons in psychology; as my pinned twitter post says:
"Technology is at genuine fault to play mirror neurons in unconscious loophole, which is where delusion of the self arises. Often nominative" ~ @MuttleySV
Simply, to end this juncture: form is sometimes solid, but perception is ever-changing, and the less we depend on solidity, the better.
"Be water, my friend" ~ Bruce Lee.
Putting myself in their shoes
I'm very empathetic
You get out what you put in
He who dares, wins, (Rodders!)
Of course, what are we really trying to say here? The meaning becomes diluted, the thing that fits with 'putting more in' to make the glass 'half full'. But sadly, this is an illusion that comes a cropper.
This is ultimately for didactic and syntactic reasons, abtruding to tactfulness in mind game form, to trick the brain that it won't crash when our mood shifts to the idea that, plainly, was the glass really ever even half full? If the glass wasn't half empty, or half full, in simple terms, to begin with, can we really say it will stay that way?
We are not talking about change, vacillaton, oscillation, movement. We are not saying someone will drink from the glass, or even fill it up.
What we need to do is come to terms with the idea of mirror neurons, the concept of mirror neurons in psychology; as my pinned twitter post says:
"Technology is at genuine fault to play mirror neurons in unconscious loophole, which is where delusion of the self arises. Often nominative" ~ @MuttleySV
Simply, to end this juncture: form is sometimes solid, but perception is ever-changing, and the less we depend on solidity, the better.
"Be water, my friend" ~ Bruce Lee.
